Brick & Mortar House Blends & Copyright Infringement
ghostsofpompeii
Master
in General
Is there currently any law on the book prohibiting Brick And Mortar Tobacco Shops from putting their own name on a bulk blend from someone like Lane Limited, Sutliff, Peter Stokkebye, Cornell & Diehl, or McClelland and passing it off as a House Blend? Then in most instances upping the price. I'm sure you've tried a House Blend that tasted exactly like something you've been smoking for years. I just wonder how many different names Lane 1-Q is currently going by in different tobacco shops? Is there some loophole insisting that a handful of something additional be mixed into the blend to justify a name change? Or can they simply transfer an established bulk tobacco from a great big plastic bag in the back of the shop into a glass canister on the front counter, stick on a label, and pass it off as a House Blend?
Comments
The thing that a few guys guys are wondering about is how some of P&C Russ O's match blends are being called the names of famous English blends of old. Lapsed trademarks? A lot of noobs are fooled into thinking they are smoking a link to the past.