Does An Expensive Pipe Smoke Better?
PappyJoe
Master
I conducted some testing and did some research. The answer is in this 3-part series...
https://pappyjoesblog.com/are-higher-priced-pipes-really-better-smokers-the-test-set-up/
https://pappyjoesblog.com/are-higher-priced-pipes-really-better-smokers-the-test-set-up/
Comments
Out of my pipes, I only have two which approached the hundred dollar mark. I have Savinellis, Kaywoodies, Albertsons, Jarls, Murrays, Multiple Grabows and Medicos (all briar), and my wonderful MM Corncobs. I also have 2 BC's and a couple of "basket pipes". Out of ALL of these I cannot find any one that equates to "stellar" as compared to the others. I would love to say the Savinellis as it would endorse spending the money at 3 to 4 times that of some of the remainder of the others. I can't, the fact is that the Savinellis DO NOT smoke 3 to 4 times some of my other pipes. I have some significantly less expensive pipes that smoke just as well.
Although I defer to the esteemed Senior Chief "Pappyjoe" for his experiment and testing, I appreciate his efforts and I have no arguments with his analysis or conclusions.
I do not know EXACTLY WHY my pipes smoke so well other than the fact that I take care of them. I still have maybe 3 that are yet unsmoked. The others all have storied and faithful service of too many years for which I will not admit (oh OKAY, 50+). I take care of them and they take care of me. The fact of the matter is they are "tools", and I have always taken care of all my tools.
Now subconciously I know some might have an edge on others because I tend to grab the same pipes. That is not due to any analysis or testing or "pricepoint" but rather my pleasant experiences with certain "tools".
The fact of the matter is I tend to anayze my pipes on a "Macro" level as opposed to a "Micro" level. I have no doubt that "Pappys" findings could be proven with a "Micro" analysis of my favorites but I just choose to "smoke 'em because I have them".
Good job Senior Chief.